Whie on x86(64) one does not normally need full memory barriers, it's
good practice to at least use compiler barriers for places where on other
architectures memory barriers are used; this prevents the compiler
from over-optimizing.
a few places in the gemm scheduler code were missing barriers;
the code likely worked OK due to heavy use of volatile / _Atomic
but there's no reason to get this incorrect
param.h defines a per-platform SWITCH_RATIO, which is used as a measure for how fine
grained the blocks for gemm need to be split up. Many platforms define this to 4.
The reality is that the gemm low level implementation for SkylakeX likes bigger blocks
due to the nature of SIMD... by tuning the SWITCH_RATIO to 32 the threading performance
improves significantly:
Before
Matrix SGEMM cycles MPC DGEMM cycles MPC
48 x 48 10756.0 10.5 -0.5% 18296.7 6.1 -1.7%
64 x 64 20490.0 12.9 1.4% 40615.0 6.5 0.0%
65 x 65 83528.3 3.3 -210.9% 96319.0 2.9 -83.3%
80 x 80 101453.5 5.1 -166.3% 128021.7 4.0 -76.6%
96 x 96 149795.1 5.9 -143.1% 168059.4 5.3 -47.4%
112 x 112 191481.2 7.3 -105.8% 204165.0 6.9 -14.6%
128 x 128 265019.2 7.9 -99.0% 272006.4 7.7 -5.3%
After
Matrix SGEMM cycles MPC DGEMM cycles MPC
48 x 48 10666.3 10.6 0.4% 18236.9 6.2 -1.4%
64 x 64 20410.1 13.0 1.8% 39925.8 6.6 1.7%
65 x 65 34983.0 7.9 -30.2% 51494.6 5.4 2.0%
80 x 80 39769.1 13.0 -4.4% 63805.2 8.1 12.0%
96 x 96 45169.6 19.7 26.7% 80065.8 11.1 29.8%
112 x 112 57026.1 24.7 38.7% 99535.5 14.2 44.1%
128 x 128 64789.8 32.5 51.3% 117407.2 17.9 54.6%
With this change, threading starts to be a win already at 96x96
The use of _Atomic leads to really bad code generation in the compiler
(on x86, you get 2 "mfence" memory barriers around each access with gcc8, despite
x86 being ordered and cache coherent). But there's a fallback in the code that
just uses volatile which is more than plenty in practice.
If we're nervous about cross thread synchronization for these variables, we should
make the YIELD function be a compiler/memory barrier instead.
performance before (after last commit)
Matrix SGEMM cycles MPC DGEMM cycles MPC
48 x 48 10630.0 10.6 0.7% 18112.8 6.2 -0.7%
64 x 64 20374.8 13.0 1.9% 40487.0 6.5 0.4%
65 x 65 141955.2 1.9 -428.3% 146708.8 1.9 -179.2%
80 x 80 178921.1 2.9 -369.6% 186032.7 2.8 -156.6%
96 x 96 205436.2 4.3 -233.4% 224513.1 3.9 -97.0%
112 x 112 244408.2 5.8 -162.7% 262158.7 5.4 -47.1%
128 x 128 321334.5 6.5 -141.3% 333829.0 6.3 -29.2%
Performance with this patch (roughly a 2x improvement):
Matrix SGEMM cycles MPC DGEMM cycles MPC
48 x 48 10756.0 10.5 -0.5% 18296.7 6.1 -1.7%
64 x 64 20490.0 12.9 1.4% 40615.0 6.5 0.0%
65 x 65 83528.3 3.3 -210.9% 96319.0 2.9 -83.3%
80 x 80 101453.5 5.1 -166.3% 128021.7 4.0 -76.6%
96 x 96 149795.1 5.9 -143.1% 168059.4 5.3 -47.4%
112 x 112 191481.2 7.3 -105.8% 204165.0 6.9 -14.6%
128 x 128 265019.2 7.9 -99.0% 272006.4 7.7 -5.3%
The jobs array is getting initialized in O(compiled cpus^2) complexity.
Distros and people with bigger systems will use pretty high values
(128 or 256 or more) for this value, leading to interesting bubbles
in performance.
Baseline (single threaded performance) gets roughly 13 - 15 multiplications per cycle
in the interesting range (threading kicks in at 65x65 mult by 65x65).
The hardware is capable of 32 multiplications per cycle theoretically.
Matrix SGEMM cycles MPC DGEMM cycles MPC
48 x 48 10703.9 10.6 0.0% 17990.6 6.3 0.0%
64 x 64 20778.4 12.8 0.0% 40629.2 6.5 0.0%
65 x 65 26869.9 10.3 0.0% 52545.7 5.3 0.0%
80 x 80 38104.5 13.5 0.0% 72492.7 7.1 0.0%
96 x 96 61626.4 14.4 0.0% 113983.8 7.8 0.0%
112 x 112 91803.8 15.3 0.0% 180987.3 7.8 0.0%
128 x 128 133161.4 15.8 0.0% 258374.3 8.1 0.0%
When threading is turned on
TARGET=SKYLAKEX F_COMPILER=GFORTRAN SHARED=1 DYNAMIC_THREADS=1 USE_OPENMP=0 NUM_THREADS=128
Matrix SGEMM cycles MPC DGEMM cycles MPC
48 x 48 10725.9 10.5 -0.2% 18134.9 6.2 -0.8%
64 x 64 20500.6 12.9 1.3% 40929.1 6.5 -0.7%
65 x 65 2040832.1 0.1 -7495.2% 2097633.6 0.1 -3892.0%
80 x 80 2063129.1 0.2 -5314.4% 2119925.2 0.2 -2824.3%
96 x 96 2070374.5 0.4 -3259.6% 2173604.4 0.4 -1806.9%
112 x 112 2111721.5 0.7 -2169.6% 2263330.8 0.6 -1170.0%
128 x 128 2276181.5 0.9 -1609.3% 2377228.9 0.9 -820.1%
There is a deep deep cliff once you hit 65x65
With this patch
Matrix SGEMM cycles MPC DGEMM cycles MPC
48 x 48 10630.0 10.6 0.7% 18112.8 6.2 -0.7%
64 x 64 20374.8 13.0 1.9% 40487.0 6.5 0.4%
65 x 65 141955.2 1.9 -428.3% 146708.8 1.9 -179.2%
80 x 80 178921.1 2.9 -369.6% 186032.7 2.8 -156.6%
96 x 96 205436.2 4.3 -233.4% 224513.1 3.9 -97.0%
112 x 112 244408.2 5.8 -162.7% 262158.7 5.4 -47.1%
128 x 128 321334.5 6.5 -141.3% 333829.0 6.3 -29.2%
The cliff is very significantly reduced.
(more to follow)
* Allow choosing the OpenMP scheduler and add range hint for GEMM_MULTITHREAD_THRESHOLD
* Amended description of GEMM_MULTITHREAD_THRESHOLD
to reflect #742 making it track floating point operations rather than matrix size
* Return a somewhat sane default value for L2 cache size if cpuid returned something unexpected
Fixes#1610, the KVM hypervisor on Google Chromebooks returning zero for CPUID 0x80000006, causing DYNAMIC_ARCH
builds of OpenBLAS to hang
Always checking num_cpu_avail() regardless of whether threading will actually
be used adds noticeable overhead for small matrices. Most other uses of
num_cpu_avail() do so only if threading will be used, so do the same here.
Craig Donner
Martin Kroeker
Arjan van de Ven