From 4a834a6214295d9194f920727213f251656a4b56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Bodewig Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:14:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Jikes is right, the fallthrough is a problem git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/core/trunk@277902 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/fixcrlf/build.xml | 9 +++++++++ .../taskdefs/fixcrlf/expected/tab_in_literal_in_comment | 2 ++ .../taskdefs/fixcrlf/input/tab_in_literal_in_comment | 2 ++ .../org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/FixCrLfTest.java | 4 ++++ 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/fixcrlf/expected/tab_in_literal_in_comment create mode 100644 src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/fixcrlf/input/tab_in_literal_in_comment diff --git a/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/fixcrlf/build.xml b/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/fixcrlf/build.xml index 1575f4be4..e44557af7 100644 --- a/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/fixcrlf/build.xml +++ b/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/fixcrlf/build.xml @@ -292,4 +292,13 @@ + + + + + + + + diff --git a/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/fixcrlf/expected/tab_in_literal_in_comment b/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/fixcrlf/expected/tab_in_literal_in_comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..553e9fc9c --- /dev/null +++ b/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/fixcrlf/expected/tab_in_literal_in_comment @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +// " " + diff --git a/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/fixcrlf/input/tab_in_literal_in_comment b/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/fixcrlf/input/tab_in_literal_in_comment new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d8878c112 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/fixcrlf/input/tab_in_literal_in_comment @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ +// " " + diff --git a/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/FixCrLfTest.java b/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/FixCrLfTest.java index 4db6abcae..2ed47360b 100644 --- a/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/FixCrLfTest.java +++ b/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/FixCrLfTest.java @@ -175,6 +175,10 @@ public class FixCrLfTest extends BuildFileTest { executeTarget("testCannotDoubleEof"); } + public void testTabInLiteralInComment() { + executeTarget("testTabInLiteralInComment"); + } + // not used, but public so theoretically must remain for BC? public void assertEqualContent(File expect, File result) throws AssertionFailedError, IOException {