After our initial discussion on the matter (see #172) this is the system
that we all seem to have agreed on. As a result, I have implemented a
simple system which effectively implements permissions, while being
extensible and tweakable so bot devs can decide what they want to do for
permissions.
As for default 'permissions', I'm not sure what the best approach would be
here; bot devs are likely to implement their own permissions 'levels' and
use those. I think the most we could do for now is add attributes to
require certain users (by id) and certain roles (by id and possibly by
name?) This would probably be the best option for now as it requires less
work from us, nor do we know the *exact* approach bot devs want to take
with permissions.
Thank you for your continuous support to the Openl Qizhi Community AI Collaboration Platform. In order to protect your usage rights and ensure network security, we updated the Openl Qizhi Community AI Collaboration Platform Usage Agreement in January 2024. The updated agreement specifies that users are prohibited from using intranet penetration tools. After you click "Agree and continue", you can continue to use our services. Thank you for your cooperation and understanding.